Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2884 (BOM)

AMAN KHAN USMAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/417/2013 · 2026-09-08

Contempt Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2013 IN WP/4582/2012 Aman Khan Usman Khan Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. S. S. Khoche h/f. Palodkar Deodatt P. for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State • Adv. A. M. Karad for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 - Absent __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) Learned Advocate Mr. Khoche holding for Mr. Palodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:41586