AMAN KHAN USMAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/417/2013 · 2026-09-08
Contempt Petitionbody2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2884 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2884 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2013 IN WP/4582/2012 Aman Khan Usman Khan Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. S. S. Khoche h/f. Palodkar Deodatt P. for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State • Adv. A. M. Karad for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 - Absent __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) Learned Advocate Mr. Khoche holding for Mr. Palodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:41586