908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 129 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 129 OF 2013 IN WP/92/2012 Sk. Jakir Sk. Akhtar And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Kale Ajeet B., Kale Ajeet B. for the Petitioners - Absent • Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for State • Adv. Chillarge Subhash S. for Respondent No. 4 __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) None appears for the petitioners. 2) In the order of which disobedience is alleged, it was directed that the Collector, Jalgaon, should decide the representation in accordance with law within six weeks. The Collector, Jalgaon had directed the Special Land Acquisition Officer (S.L.A.O.) to calculate the rental compensation. Accordingly, the chart was prepared by the S.L.A.O., Jalgaon for the purpose of payment of rental compensation. Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:41582 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 129 OF 2013 3) The aforesaid exercise was done in the year 2012. It is presumed that, by this time,the petitioners must have received the amount as per the chart. Otherwise also, the matter is not circulated from the year 2014. 4) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2