389.13CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 389 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4590 OF 2009 MRS. SEEMA D/O.MANOHARRAO BOKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Ms.Priyanka D.Maske h/f. Mr.S.B.Talekar AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 ORDER : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.] 1] By the order under contempt Education Officer was directed to grant approval to the petitioner’s services after the submission of proposal by management. 2] The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent no.2 wherein in para no.7 it is stated that the order under contempt is complied with and the approval is granted to the petitioner by order dated 06.11.2013. 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:41161