351.13CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 351 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4794 OF 2012 RATNAKAR KISAN RAJGURU VERSUS KUNAL KUMAR ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.Rajdeep D. Raut … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 PER COURT : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.] 1] In the order of which disobedience is alleged, it was directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in the month of January, 2012. With the passage of time, it is presumed that the representation of the petitioner must have been decided. 2] Otherwise also the petitioner has not circulated the petition after issuance of notice and it seems that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the contempt. 3] In view of the same, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:41166