100.13CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9512 OF 2011 SAYYAD RUKSANA DASTAGIR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.D.K.Thote h/f. Mr.A.V.Patil [Indrale] AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosle Advocate for Respondent no.4 : Mr.Shubham S.Kate h/f. Mr.V.D.Hon ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 PER COURT : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.] 1] Mr.D.K.Thote, learned Advocate holding for Mr.A.V.Patil [Indrale] submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:41168