910 cp 443-13 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONT. PETITION NO. 443 OF 2013 IN CP/169/2012 KUNDLIK KISAN GHUGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. The present contempt petition is the second round of proceedings. In the earlier round of the contempt petition, this Court had passed an order recording that the order alleged to have been disobeyed had been complied with by granting liberty to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in the event the said order was not complied with in toto. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner filed the present contempt petition in the year 2013 alleging non-compliance of the order. However, after issuance of notice, the petitioner has not circulated the matter VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40117 910 cp 443-13 . thereafter and has not shown any diligence in pursuing the present petition or in seeking compliance with the order under contempt. 4. In view of the same, contempt petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|2