SUDINA RUBJI VALVI v. SAMBHAJIRAO M SARKUNDE AND ANOTHER
CP/341/2013 · 2026-09-01
Contempt Petitionbody2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2854 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2854 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
903 cp 341-13 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONT. PETITION NO. 341 OF 2013 IN WP/972/2013 SUDINA RUBJI VALVI VERSUS SAMBHAJIRAO M SARKUNDE AND ANOTHER … Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State …. CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT :
1. None for the petitioner.
2. Learned AGP submits that the order of which disobedience has been alleged in this contempt petition is complied with. The compliance is also stated in the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No. 2.
3. In any event, the petitioner has not circulated the matter since 06/09/2013 and has not been diligent in pursuing the present contempt petition.
4. In view of the above, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40114