904 cp 342-13 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONT. PETITION NO. 342 OF 2013 IN WP/2817/2010 GANESHSINGH PRAKASHSINGH THAKUR (RAGHUWANSHI) AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Mr. Bedre Vinayak Sudhakar, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the passage of time, the order alleged to have been disobeyed, must have been complied with. 2. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40123