Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2852 (BOM)

JOTIBA SADASHIV SALUNKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/426/2013 · 2026-09-01

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

909 cp 426-13 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONT. PETITION NO. 426 OF 2013 IN WP/5938/2011 JOTIBA SADASHIV SALUNKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. The report of the Resource Personnel of this Court indicates that respondent No. 3 has filed an affidavit-in-reply. In paragraph 4 thereof, it is stated that the amount calculated towards rent and interest was deposited with the office of the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Manjara Project, Osmanabad, on 09/12/2013. 3. As such, it is presumed that, by now, the petitioners must have withdrawn the said amount. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40118