907 cp 381-13 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CONT. PETITION NO. 381 OF 2013 IN WP/618/2013 GANGARAM NAGOBA CHILKEWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. A. R. Tapse h/f Mr. Suryawanshi Prashant D., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Pathan Hamzakhan I. , Advocate for Respondent No.2 …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by letter dated 05/09/2013. The said letter is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the compliance of the order. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40120