SAJABAI NAKU MANURE AND ANR v. SHEETAL UGALE AND OTHERS
CP/348/2013 · 2026-09-01
Contempt Petitionbody2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2850 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2850 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
905 cp 348-13 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONT. PETITION NO. 348 OF 2013 IN WP/4081/2012 SAJABAI NAKU MANURE AND ANR VERSUS SHEETAL UGALE AND OTHERS … Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State ….
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT :
1. None for the petitioners.
2. The report of the Resource Personnel of this Court indicates that after 2013, the petitioners have not circulated the matter and have not been diligent in pursuing the present contempt petition.
3. In any event, in the order alleged to have been disobeyed, it was
directed that the names of the petitioners be added to the list of beneficiaries under the Indira Awas Yojana prepared by the Project Director, District Rural Development Agency.
4. With the passage of time and in absence of any steps taken by the petitioners to pursue the matter, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:40122