111.23CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 111 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8312/2012 DATTU HILAL WANKHEDE & OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioners : Mr.Kalyan Patil h/f. Mr.S.R.Barlinge AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosale … CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 25.08.2026 P.C. : 1] The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent no.3 stating that the order under contempt is complied with and the same is confirmed by learned Advocate Mr.Kalyan Patil holding for Advocate Mr.S.R.Barlinge for the petitioner. 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:38809