Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2840 (BOM)

RAUF NYAJU PATEL v. THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

CP/31/2013 · 2026-08-28

Public Interest Litigationbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

901 CONT. PETITION NO. 31 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONT. PETITION NO. 31 OF 2013 IN PIL/5/2012 Rauf Nyaju Patel Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another __________________________________________________________ Adv. G. P. Darandale h/f. Adv. Kakade Amol N . for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.GP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) Although the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that as per the order under contempt, enquiry had already been initiated and the final order must have been passed by now. 3) Even otherwise, it appears that the petitioner has been negligent in pursuing this matter. Since the year 2013, the petitioner has neither circulated the matter nor provided any instructions to his own counsel. 4) In view of the above, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble 2026:BHC-AUG:39010