NANDKUMAR TUKARAM TIVGHALE v. KRUSHNANT NAGNATH DESHMUKH
CP/35/2013 · 2026-08-28
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2837 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2837 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
903 CONT. PETITION NO. 35 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONT. PETITION NO. 35 OF 2013 IN WP/7383/2011 Nandkumar Tukaram Tivghale Versus Krushnant Nagnath Deshmukh __________________________________________________________ Adv. Gayatri S. Kalve h/f. Adv. Mahesh V. Ghatge for the Petitioner Ms. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for State __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Although the learned Advocate Ms. Gayatri S. Kalve, holding for learned counsel Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge for the petitioner, seeks an adjournment, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the
order under contempt has already been complied with, albeit belatedly, in the year 2015. 2) In view of the compliance, nothing survives in the present petition. The Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of. Rule stands discharged.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
2026:BHC-AUG:39014