Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2833 (BOM)

MOHD ABDUL QUADEER MOHD ABDUL KHALIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/246/2013 · 2026-08-27

Contempt Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 246 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 246 OF 2013 IN WP/5044/2010 MOHD ABDUL QUADEER MOHD ABDUL KHALIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Adv. V. G. Salgare, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv.G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. R. K. Kharat h/f V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Respondent 2 and 5 ….. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 27/08/2026 Per Court: . By order dated 20.04.2012 passed by this Court in writ petition No. 5044 of 2010, respondent No. 3 was directed to decide the proposal regarding the deemed date of promotion of the petitioner. The proposal was forwarded by the Zilla Parishad, Nanded, respondent No.3 to the Commissioner, Aurangabad on 11.07.2013. Since the proposal was forwarded in the year 2013, the proposal must have been decided by this time. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition and petition stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:39012