908 CONT. PETITION NO. 310 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONT. PETITION NO. 310 OF 2013 IN WP/2125/2012 Dr. Parmeshwar Honaji Kale Versus The Union Of India And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Dhoble Vishnu Laxman for the Petitioner - Absent Adv. Manish N. Navandar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None appears for the petitioner. 2) The learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that by way of an interim order, the petitioner was protected only from being replaced by anyone other than a permanent candidate. Subsequently, a permanent candidate became available and was appointed in place of the petitioner. 3) Moreover, under the order dated 04.12.2013, this Court had already opined that there is no violation of the interim order passed by this Court, which is the subject Komal Kamble 2026:BHC-AUG:39024-DB 908 CONT. PETITION NO. 310 OF 2013 matter of this contempt petition. Furthermore, the main Writ Petition No. 2125 of 2012 was already dismissed on 29.01.2014. 4) In view of the above, nothing survives in the present petition. Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble