Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2825 (BOM)

SURESH GANGARAM PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/234/2013 · 2026-08-27

Contempt Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 234 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 234 OF 2013 IN WP/4063/2013 SURESH GANGARAM PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Adv. Sachin A. Mane h/f Adv. P. B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State ….. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 27/08/2026 Per Court: . The learned counsel holding for Mr. Patil for petitioner states that the Contempt Petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. 2. In view of the same, the Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:39015