Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2802 (BOM)

KAILAS KASHINATH PATIL AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

REVN/66/2013 · 2026-08-14

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

35-REVN-66-2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2013 Kailas Kashinath Patil And Anr. ...Applicants Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent **** Mr. Tushar Nikam i/b Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for the Applicant Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. D.J. Haldankar, APP for the Respondent/State. **** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 14th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted on instructions that Applicant No.1 has expired in 2013 and Applicant No.2 has expired in 2024. 2. Considering that revision was filed against the order of conviction and since both the Applicants have expired, the revision application is disposed of as abated. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Navnath Waghmare 1 NAVNATH SITARAM WAGHMARE Digitally signed by NAVNATH SITARAM WAGHMARE Date: 2026.08.14 20:05:31 +0530