Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2744 (BOM)

ICICI BANK LTD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTR

STXA/14/2013 · 2026-08-11

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2-STXA-14-2013 (OS) -SPK.DOC Mayur IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SALES TAX APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2013 ICICI Bank Ltd …Appellant Versus State Of Maharashtra …Respondents Ms. Nikita Badheka, a/w Mr. Parth Badheka, for the Appellant. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 11th AUGUST 2026. PC:- 1. Mr. Parth Badheka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the entire amount has been paid by the ICICI Bank to the State Government. Therefore, he has instruction to withdraw the appeal. The prayer is allowed. 2. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { This order is corrected/modified as per the speaking to minutes order dated 13st August 2026. MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Digitally signed by MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Date: 2026.08.13 18:48:15 +0530