1 of 5 14-FA.1836.2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1836 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SHANKAR GANGADHARRAO SINGEWAR AND OTHERS ... Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ... AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2517 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS MANORAMABAI VASANTRAO KHEDKAR AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2521 OF 2013 NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NANDED VERSUS ABDUL MUBIN ABDUL RASHID AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2526 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS RATANSINGH AMARSINGH BASIWALE AND OTHERS 2026:BHC-AUG:26608 2 of 5 14-FA.1836.2013 … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2520 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SHARADCHANDRA BHALCHANDRA SHAHU AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2515 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS MOHANSING RATANSINGH LANGRI AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2519 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS ONKAR RATAN CHAVAN AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2524 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY 3 of 5 14-FA.1836.2013 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS KUSUMBAI PADMAKAR SHINGEWAR AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2522 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SY. KHAJA SALIM PASHA AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2523 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS LAXMAN MANIRAM AHER AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2518 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS HASHAM ALI RAMZAN ALI AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. 4 of 5 14-FA.1836.2013 AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2525 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS NANAK KAUR DHARAMSINGH SANDHU AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 2516 OF 2013 THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SUDHAKAR GANGADHARRAO SINGEWAR AND OTHERS … Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. The appearance of Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, learned Advocate, stands discharged. Mr. Ingole, learned Advocate, appears for the Appellant. 3. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted 5 of 5 14-FA.1836.2013 by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned orders. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef