SHUBHAM JAIPRAKASH PAGARE AND OTHERS v. MRS. ANITA AGNIHOTRI AND ANOTHER
CP/298/2015 · 2026-02-27
Shri Abasaheb D Shinde, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2701 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 2701 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 916- C. P. 298-2013.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CONT. PETITION NO. 298 OF 2015 IN WP/7394/2014 Shubham Jaiprakash Pagare And Others VERSUS Mrs. Anita Agnihotri And Another ... AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 27, 2026
ORDER:-
1. None for the petitioners.
2. However, on going through the record, it appears that under the
order of contempt dated 10th February 2025, this Court has granted liberty to the petitioners for making representation to respondent Nos.2 and 4 for grant of scholarship for the course of “Aircraft Maintenance”. However, as per the order dated 27th April 2015, it was already communicated to the petitioners by respondent No.2 herein that no such scholarship was available for the said course, and therefore, representation made by the petitioners was rejected. The said order appears to be passed after passing order under contempt, wherein only direction was given to respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to decide the representation of the petitioners.
(2) 916- C. P. 298-2013.odt
3. Thus, the representation of the petitioners is already decided as per the order under contempt, and therefore, nothing survives in this petition.
3. The contempt petition stands disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/