Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 2700 (BOM)

DILIP SAKHARAM JADHAV AND ORS v. MANOHAR BHIKA JADHAV AND ORS

WP/262/2013 · 2026-02-27

Shri Abhay S Waghwase

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 955-WP-262-2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12290 OF 2016 IN WP/262/2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1420 OF 2018 IN WP/262/2013 DILIP SAKHARAM JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS MANOHAR BHIKA JADHAV AND OTHERS ...... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa Advocate for Respondent No.9:Mr. V. D. Khivesara h/f. Mr. A. S. Bajaj Advocate for Respondent No.11 : Ms. Zainab M. Surti Advocate for Respondent No.12 : Mr. U. P. Darak h/f. Mr. B.A. Darak Advocate for Respondent Nos.14 and 16 : Mr. S. S. Khoche h/f. Mr. D. P. Palodkar ...... CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. DATED : 27 FEBRUARY 2026 PER COURT : 1. As the issue of maintainability has been raised, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach before the learned District Court by invoking Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 2. Permission granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 2026:BHC-AUG:8836 -2- 955-WP-262-2013 3. Pending Civil Applications, if any, are also disposed off. 4. Learned District Court shall make an endevour to decide the proceedings as expeditiously as possible. 5. Interim relief, if any, shall continue till the Appeal is filed. (ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.) Tandale