$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1258/2013 KRISHAN PRASAD SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Adv. (through VC) from DHCLSC. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State (through VC) along with Mr.Arsalan Naik and Mr.Siddhaartha Goyal, Advs. SI Shilpy Gupta PS South Campus. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R % 27.02.2026 1. Hybrid Mode. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant stated that Appellant has completed his sentence and the nominal roll substantiates this fact. 3. The Appellant is resident of Nepal and the record, either with the Court or with the police, does not have any address of Nepal. 4. Report on the process issued suggests that Appellant is not available at the local address and ultimately it has been submitted upon by both prosecution and learned counsel for Appellant (appearing through VC) that the matter may be disposed of. 5. In such circumstances there appears no reason to keep the appeal pending, as has been suggested by both the sides, therefore, the same stands dismissed as “infructuous”. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/bj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:39:16