HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 484/2013 1. Shri Ram Niwas Meena, Secretary at that time J.D.A., J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur. At present Retire, R/o E-64-III Avenue, Lal Bahadur Nagar, (west) J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur. 2. Shri D.B. Gupta, Commissioner at that time J.D.A., J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur. At present Principles Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Sh. M.L. Gupta, Additional Director, Revenue & Property Disposal, JDA, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur. At present Financial Advisor, Nagar Nigam, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan 2. M/S Jain Relators Pvt. Ltd. Best Acrade, Pocket 6, Section 12, Dwarka, New Delhi through Ajay Kumar Jain. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr.Suresh Sahni JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 23/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 20.12.2012 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) & Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under Sections 420, 167 & 120-B IPC in criminal case No.819/2012. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-484/2013] 2. At the outset, an objection has been taken by counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-complainant that the aforesaid order is revisable, hence, under these circumstances, the instant petition is not maintainable. He further submits that revision petition is maintainable against the order by which cognizance has been taken as the same is final in nature, hence, this petition is liable to be rejected on this count alone. 3. Considering the above preliminary objection taken by counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant-respondent and looking to the fact that the order taking cognizance is final order against which a revision petition is maintainable, on this count alone, the instant petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the aforesaid order before the Revisional Court by way of filing revision petition, if they so desired. 4. In case, such revision petition is submitted by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today before the Revisional Court, it is expected from the Revisional Court to decide the revision petition strictly in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to both the sides, ignoring the period of limitation. 5. Accordingly, the instant criminal petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /22