IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 119 RAM GANESH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Ist ACP w.e.f. 01.01.2013, instead of service rendered by him in the Sugar Mill, based Appeal No.4446 of 2008, titled as ‘ Deepak Sood and others’ which was not taken into account while rej vide Annexure P therefore, has been submitted to the respondents, evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to them 2. limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28464 Date of decision RAM GANESH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Paramvir Singh Doon, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Advocate, for respondent No.3. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is entitled to the Ist ACP w.e.f. 01.01.2013, instead of 01.03.2019 service rendered by him in the Sugar Mill, based Appeal No.4446 of 2008, titled as ‘State of Haryana and another vs. Deepak Sood and others’, decided on 15.07.2008, Annexure P which was not taken into account while rejectin vide Annexure P-11. A representation dated 04.09.2025, Annexure P has been submitted to the respondents, evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be them to decide the same in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents have no limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 28464-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Paramvir Singh Doon, Advocate, Haryana. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is entitled to the 01.03.2019, by counting the past service rendered by him in the Sugar Mill, based on the judgment in Civil State of Haryana and another vs. decided on 15.07.2008, Annexure P-14, ecting his claim on 25.09.2019, 11. A representation dated 04.09.2025, Annexure P-13, has been submitted to the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be bound manner. counsel for the respondents have no objection to the PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28464-2026 -2- 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, within a period of 6 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made herein above as also the afore-judgment, granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 10.09.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document