KRISHAN SINGH v. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL BATHINDA AND ANR
CWP/6095/2013 · 2026-09-10
Kirti Singh
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 1909 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 1909 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
222
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6095-2013 (O&M) Decided on : September 10, 2026 KRISHAN SINGH . . . Petitioner Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL BATHINDA AND ANR
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Simarpreet Kaur Dhawan, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Goyat, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. S.C. Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised the Court that the petitioner is not in contact her and also pleads no instructions. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the instant petition within a period of one month. Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH) September 10, 2026
JUDGE Ithlesh Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2026.09.11 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment