Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1909 (PNJ)

KRISHAN SINGH v. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL BATHINDA AND ANR

CWP/6095/2013 · 2026-09-10

Kirti Singh

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6095-2013 (O&M) Decided on : September 10, 2026 KRISHAN SINGH . . . Petitioner Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL BATHINDA AND ANR . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Simarpreet Kaur Dhawan, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Goyat, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. S.C. Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised the Court that the petitioner is not in contact her and also pleads no instructions. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the instant petition within a period of one month. Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) September 10, 2026 JUDGE Ithlesh Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2026.09.11 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment