Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1902 (PNJ)

BALBIR SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/27138/2018 · 2026-07-28

Aman Chaudhary

Civil Appealbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212. Balbir Singh and others State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY 1. of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jagjit Singh that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner 2. limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Balbir Singh and others Versus State of Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kamal Deep Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Dimple Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Bikram Choudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.6. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel restricts his claim for grant of arrears in terms of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jagjit Singh in Civil Appeal No.213 of 2013 that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27138-2018 Date of decision: 28.07.2026 ... Petitioners ... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kamal Deep Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana. y, Advocate claim for grant of arrears in terms of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab Versus in Civil Appeal No.213 of 2013. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a for the respondents has no objection to the claim for grant of arrears in terms State of Punjab Versus He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a e SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-27138-2018 - 2 - 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, expeditiously, in accordance with law, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 28.07.2026 JUDGE sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.29 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document