Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1901 (PNJ)

JASVIR SINGH v. UHBVN & ORS

CWP/5477/2013 · 2026-07-28

Aman Chaudhary

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 921 CWP-5477-2013 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 JASVIR SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS UHBVN & ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. J.P. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that father of the petitioner, who was working as Assistant Line Man, died in harness on 27.03.1991 and as per the Ex-gratia Scheme of the Government, he was neither given compassionate appointment nor any kind of financial assistance. He prays that his claim may be directed to be reconsidered in a time bound manner. 2. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide the same afresh, within six months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made hereinabove after granting opportunity of hearing to him, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.29 13:04 I am the author of this document CWP-5477-2013 -2- 3. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 28, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.29 13:04 I am the author of this document