JAI RAM v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS
CWP/5670/2013 · 2026-07-28
Aman Chaudhary
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 1897 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 1897 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 922
CWP-5670-2013 (O&M)
Date of decision: 28.07.2026 JAI RAM
... Petitioner
Versus UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the UHBVN.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
In view of the order dated 26.02.2015, the present petition is
disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that cause still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 28.07.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.28 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document