Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1872 (PNJ)

PARTAP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRR/3692/2013 · 2026-07-08

Sumeet Goel

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRR CRR CRR CRR----3692 3692 3692 3692----2013 2013 2013 2013 287 287 287 287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Partap Singh State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL petition in hand: judgment dated 17.11.2010 payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for 2 judgments suffers with great manifest injustice and are liable to be 2013 2013 2013 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRR CRR CRR CRR----3692 3692 3692 3692----2013 2013 2013 2013 Partap Singh versus Punjab and others Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: July 08 July 08 July 08 July 08, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: July 08 July 08 July 08 July 08, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Ravi Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) The following substantive prayer has been made in the revision petition in hand: ““““It is therefore respectfully prayed that present petition may kindly be allowed as prayed above and to set aside the impugned judgment dated 17.11.2010 passed by Ld. JMIC, Amritsar, whereby the petitioner has been sentenced and undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and a fine of Rs.500/- under section 304-A IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for 2 months and further convicted months rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine 279 IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for one month and to set aside the impugned judgment passed by Ld. Addl. Session Judge, Amritsar dated 08.10.2013, whereby the Ld. ASJ, Amritsar not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case and wrongly dismissed the appeal of present petitioner vide its judgment dated 08.10.2013 by upholding the judgment passed Ld. MIC Amritsar. Both the judgments suffers with great manifest injustice and are liable to be set aside inter-alia on the grounds set forth in the in the interest of justice, equity and fair play. 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2013 2013 2013 2013 ....Petitioner ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab. substantive prayer has been made in the revision It is therefore respectfully prayed that present petition may as prayed above and to set aside the impugned passed by Ld. JMIC, Amritsar, y the petitioner has been sentenced and convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and a fine A IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for 2 the petitioner to undergo two months rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.500/- U/s 279 IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for one month and to set aside the by Ld. Addl. Session Judge, Amritsar dated 08.10.2013, whereby the Ld. ASJ, Amritsar not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case and wrongly dismissed the appeal of present petitioner vide its judgment dated 08.10.2013 by passed Ld. MIC Amritsar. Both the judgments suffers with great manifest injustice and are liable to be alia on the grounds set forth in the present petition in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.”””” ....Petitioner s substantive prayer has been made in the revision It is therefore respectfully prayed that present petition may as prayed above and to set aside the impugned passed by Ld. JMIC, Amritsar, convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and a fine A IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for 2 the petitioner to undergo two U/s 279 IPC and in case of default in payment of fine further undergo additional imprisonment for one month and to set aside the by Ld. Addl. Session Judge, Amritsar dated 08.10.2013, whereby the Ld. ASJ, Amritsar not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case and wrongly dismissed the appeal of present petitioner vide its judgment dated 08.10.2013 by passed Ld. MIC Amritsar. Both the judgments suffers with great manifest injustice and are liable to be present petition MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.08 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRR CRR CRR CRR----3692 3692 3692 3692----2013 2013 2013 2013 2222 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-side has submitted that the sole petitioner has since passed away and, thus, revision petition in hand has been rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Needless to say that the concerned parties shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 08 July 08 July 08 July 08, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.08 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment