RSA-4970- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 255 Ran Singh State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts whereby for declaration 2. order-sheets reveals that notice of motion in the present appeal was issued way back vide order dated 11.12.2013 by the Predecessor Bench. Thereafter, the matter was repeatedly adjourned learned counsel for the ap 05.09.2017 and 17.04.2023 the appellant on 19.12.2014, 04.09.2015, 15.03.2016 and 11.09.2018 3. the case having been called twice. 4. has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the -2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Singh Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiff is in second appeal judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts whereby declaration and possession filed by the plaintiff The present second appeal is of the year 201 sheets reveals that notice of motion in the present appeal was issued way back vide order dated 11.12.2013 by the Predecessor Bench. Thereafter, the matter was repeatedly adjourned learned counsel for the appellant i.e. on 05.09.2017 and 17.04.2023 or on account of non the appellant on 19.12.2014, 04.09.2015, 15.03.2016 and 11.09.2018 Today again the appellant had gone un having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4970-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts whereby suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed. present second appeal is of the year 2013. Perusal of the sheets reveals that notice of motion in the present appeal was issued way back vide order dated 11.12.2013 by the Predecessor Bench. Thereafter, the matter was repeatedly adjourned either at the request of pellant i.e. on 13.10.2014, 18.07.2017, on account of non-appearance on behalf of the appellant on 19.12.2014, 04.09.2015, 15.03.2016 and 11.09.2018. Today again the appellant had gone un-represented, despite A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in his pursuit of the present It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the concurrent suit 3. Perusal of the sheets reveals that notice of motion in the present appeal was issued way back vide order dated 11.12.2013 by the Predecessor Bench. at the request of 13.10.2014, 18.07.2017, appearance on behalf of represented, despite pursuit of the present It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-4970- Court has been expende interest of justice. casual and careless approach. counsel is Court is left with no other option except to non-prosecution 5. 6. 25.05.2026 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant ha casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor seriously interested in pursuing the Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 25.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable d in affording opportunities to the appellant in the On the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly It is clear that neither the appellant nor his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No d in affording opportunities to the appellant in the ly Thus, this the same for RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.