IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 (2 cases) 1. Subha Chand and others Sube Singh and others 2. Subha Chand and others Sube Singh and others CORAM: Present:- RSA Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 (2 cases) Civil Misc. No.7446-C Civil Misc. No.4460-C Civil Misc. No.9619-C Regular Second Appeal No.158 of 2013 Date of decision :-27.05 Subha Chand and others …..Applicants Versus Sube Singh and others Civil Misc. No.7452-C Civil Misc. No.4411-C Civil Misc. No.9620-C Regular Second Appeal No.246 of 2013 Subha Chand and others …..Applicants Versus Sube Singh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Bansal, Advocate for the applicants-appellants. Mr. S.S. Sarwara, Advocate and Mr. Briz Mohan, Advocate for the subsequent purchaser 2026 in RSA-158-2013 & in CM 246-2013. Mr. Anil Ghangas, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 26 (in RSA and for respondents No.1 to 19, 20 2013). Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C-2026 in/and C-2026 in/and C-2016 in/and Regular Second Appeal No.158 of 2013 (O & M) .05.2026 Applicants-appellants …..Respondents C-2026 in/and C-2026 in/and C-2016 in/and Regular Second Appeal No.246 of 2013 (O & M) …..Applicants-appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Arun Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Bansal, Advocate appellants. Mr. S.S. Sarwara, Advocate and for the subsequent purchaser/applicant(s) in CM-4460-C- 2013 & in CM-4411-C-2026 in RSA- Mr. Anil Ghangas, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 26 (in RSA-158-2013). and for respondents No.1 to 19, 20-A to 22 (in RSA-246- VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.29 17.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) CM-9619 246-2013 applicants as party respondents. notice of the applications and have no objection in case the present applications are allowed. applicants therein are impleaded as party respondents in the main appeals accordingly. CM-4460 158-2013, CM 2026 in RSA record the compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties and for disposal of the present Regular Second Appeals in terms thereof. CM-4460 246-2013 have been filed by the subsequent purchasers for taking on record Compromise Annexure whereas CM in RSA-246 for disposal of the appeals in terms of the said compromise. appellants/plaintiffs submits that in view of the compromise arrived at RSA Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 9619-C-2016 in RSA-158-2013 & CM 2013 Prayer in these applications is for impleading the applicants as party respondents. Notice of these applications. Learned counsel appearing from opposite sides accept notice of the applications and have no objection in case the present applications are allowed. Accordingly, the present applications are allowed and the applicants therein are impleaded as party respondents in the main appeals accordingly. 4460-C-2026 in RSA-158-2013, CM 2013, CM-4411-C-2026 in RSA-246 in RSA-246-2013 The present applications have been filed for placing on record the compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties and for disposal of the present Regular Second Appeals in terms thereof. 4460-C-2026 in RSA-158-2013 and 2013 have been filed by the subsequent purchasers for taking on record Compromise Annexure-CX effected between the parties, whereas CM-7446-C-2026 in RSA-158- 246-2013 have been filed by the appellant for disposal of the appeals in terms of the said compromise. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/plaintiffs submits that in view of the compromise arrived at Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) 2 2013 & CM-9620-C-2016 in RSA- e applications is for impleading the Learned counsel appearing from opposite sides accept notice of the applications and have no objection in case the present cordingly, the present applications are allowed and the applicants therein are impleaded as party respondents in the main 2013, CM-7446-C-2026 in RSA- 246-2013 and CM-7452-C- The present applications have been filed for placing on record the compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties and for disposal of the present Regular Second Appeals in terms thereof. 2013 and CM-4411-C-2026 in RSA- 2013 have been filed by the subsequent purchasers for taking on CX effected between the parties, -2013 and CM-7452-C-2026 2013 have been filed by the appellants/plaintiffs praying for disposal of the appeals in terms of the said compromise. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/plaintiffs submits that in view of the compromise arrived at VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.29 17.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document between the parties, the appellants/plaintiffs confine the to land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Marla and do not press the present appeals qua land measuring 24 Kanal. It has accordingly been prayed that the present appeals be partly allowed and the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants be decreed qua land measu only, whereas the claim qua land measuring 24 Kanal be treated as dismissed. It is further submitted that, as per the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani, the said lan granted in favour of respondents No.1 to 26 in RSA respondents No.1 to 19, 20A and 22 in RSA RSA-158 2013, who is present in Court, on instructions, submits that the said respondents have no objection if the present appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid terms in view of the compromise effected between the parties. learned counsel for the parties and has perused the compromise placed on record. Since the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and the compromise appears to have been effected voluntarily, without any coercion or undue accepting the same. CM-4411 RSA Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) between the parties, the appellants/plaintiffs confine the to land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Marla and do not press the present appeals qua land measuring 24 Kanal. It has accordingly been prayed that the present appeals be partly allowed and the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants be decreed qua land measu only, whereas the claim qua land measuring 24 Kanal be treated as dismissed. It is further submitted that, as per the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani, the said land measuring 24 Kanal already stands granted in favour of respondents No.1 to 26 in RSA respondents No.1 to 19, 20A and 22 in RSA Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 26 in 158-2013 and respondents No.1 to 19, 20A an 2013, who is present in Court, on instructions, submits that the said respondents have no objection if the present appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid terms in view of the compromise effected between the This Court has considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and has perused the compromise placed on record. Since the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and the compromise appears to have been effected voluntarily, without any coercion or undue influence, this Court finds no impediment in accepting the same. Accordingly, CM-4460-C-2026 in RSA 4411-C-2026 in RSA-246-2013 are allowed and Compromise Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) 3 between the parties, the appellants/plaintiffs confine their claim only to land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Marla and do not press the present appeals qua land measuring 24 Kanal. It has accordingly been prayed that the present appeals be partly allowed and the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants be decreed qua land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Marla only, whereas the claim qua land measuring 24 Kanal be treated as dismissed. It is further submitted that, as per the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District d measuring 24 Kanal already stands granted in favour of respondents No.1 to 26 in RSA-158-2013 and respondents No.1 to 19, 20A and 22 in RSA-246-2013. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 26 in 2013 and respondents No.1 to 19, 20A and 22 in RSA-246- 2013, who is present in Court, on instructions, submits that the said respondents have no objection if the present appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid terms in view of the compromise effected between the ered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and has perused the compromise placed on record. Since the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and the compromise appears to have been effected voluntarily, without influence, this Court finds no impediment in 2026 in RSA-158-2013 and 2013 are allowed and Compromise VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.29 17.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Annexure 158-2013 and CM partly allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The suit of the plaintiffs/appellants shall stand decreed qua land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Mar Kanal, the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani shall remain intact and the claim of the plaintiffs/appellants to that extent shall stand dismissed. stand disposed of. May 27, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) Annexure-CX is taken on record. Further, CM 2013 and CM-7452-C-2026 in RSA-246 Consequently, RSA-158-2013 and RSA partly allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The suit of the plaintiffs/appellants shall stand decreed qua land measuring 63 Kanal 2 Marla. However, qua land measuring 24 Kanal, the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani shall remain intact and the claim of the plaintiffs/appellants to that extent shall stand dismissed. The compromise/settlement shall form part of the decree. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Nos.158 and 246 of 2013 (O & M) 4 CX is taken on record. Further, CM-7446-C-2026 in RSA- 246-2013 are also allowed. 2013 and RSA-246-2013 are partly allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The suit of the plaintiffs/appellants shall stand decreed qua la. However, qua land measuring 24 Kanal, the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani shall remain intact and the claim of the plaintiffs/appellants to that extent shall stand ompromise/settlement shall form part of the decree. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.29 17.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document