RSA-383 134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Chanan Singh Satpal Singh CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) judgments and decrees dated 01.05.2013 and 30.07.2015 passed by the learned Courts behalf of the appellant/ plaintiff was dismissed. 2. unfortunately, the appellant is no more and despite having informed the legal heirs of the deceased about t appeal, he has not been able to get complete instructions with respect to the submits that the present appeal be dismissed for non this stage and in case any cause of the appellant, liberty can be granted for seeking revival of the same 383-2016 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RSA Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 Chanan Singh Versus Satpal Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant (through VC) None for the respondent. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 01.05.2013 and 30.07.2015 passed by the learned Courts below; whereby the suit for possession filed on behalf of the appellant/ plaintiff was dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that unfortunately, the appellant is no more and despite having informed the legal heirs of the deceased about t appeal, he has not been able to get complete instructions with respect to their impleadment despite repeated reminders. He thus submits that the present appeal be dismissed for non this stage and in case any cause survives in favour of the legal heirs of the appellant, liberty can be granted for seeking revival of the same IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-383-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 …….Appellant Versus ..….Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant (through VC) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 01.05.2013 and 30.07.2015 passed by below; whereby the suit for possession filed on behalf of the appellant/ plaintiff was dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that unfortunately, the appellant is no more and despite having informed the legal heirs of the deceased about the pendency of the present appeal, he has not been able to get complete instructions with impleadment despite repeated reminders. He thus submits that the present appeal be dismissed for non-prosecution at survives in favour of the legal heirs of the appellant, liberty can be granted for seeking revival of the same By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 01.05.2013 and 30.07.2015 passed by below; whereby the suit for possession filed on Learned counsel for the appellant submits that unfortunately, the appellant is no more and despite having informed he pendency of the present appeal, he has not been able to get complete instructions with impleadment despite repeated reminders. He thus prosecution at survives in favour of the legal heirs of the appellant, liberty can be granted for seeking revival of the same MOHMED ATIK 2026.04.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgmemtt RSA-383 by moving an appropriate application. 3 is dismissed for non 07.04.2026 sanjay 383-2016 [2] by moving an appropriate application. In view of the above, the present Regular is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty 07.04.2026 (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? In view of the above, the present Regular Second Appeal prosecution with liberty aforesaid. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Appeal MOHMED ATIK 2026.04.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgmemtt