RFA No. 533 of 2 IN THE HIG M/s Jubiliant Ma State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BL Argued by:- Ms. Mr. for t Mr. DEEPAK GUPTA, Land Basai, Tehsil and under Section 4 notification date dated 30.01.2013 the acquired land 18 of the Act w Reference Court the land of the a benefits. 2. By w 3. It is that it is a cover of 2024 Page No. 1 of 2 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR RFA No. 533 of t Malls Pvt. Ltd. Versus ana & Ors. Reserved on: April 01 Pronounced on: Apri Pronounced fully/operat * * * * N’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Ms. Maninee, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Gaurav Garg, AAG Haryana. *** TA, J. Land of the appellant and other and District Gurugram, was notifie n 4 of the Land Acquisition Ac ated 25.05.2011 under Section 6 o 2013, the Land Acquisition Collecto land @ ₹1,50,00,000/- per acre. Re t were filed by the appellant as w urt vide its award dated 02.01.202 he appellant @ ₹2,62,08,000/- per By way of this appeal, the appellant It is submitted at the outset by lea overed case, inasmuch as several o HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH of 2023(O&M) ..…Appellant …Respondents il 01, 2026 April 02, 2026 erative part : Fully PTA er land owners situated in village tified for acquisition on 25.05.2010 Act, 1894, followed by anothe 6 of the Act ibid. Vide award No.3 lector assessed the market value o e. Reference petitions under Section as well as various land owner. Th .2023 assessed the market value o per acre apart from other statutor lants seek further enhancement. learned counsel for the appellant ral other land owners, aggrieved b lants illage 2010 other o.33 ue of ction . The ue of utory llants d by JITEN SHARMA 2026.04.02 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA No. 533 of 2 the valuation ass First Appeals bef led by RFA No. 1 Vs. State of Hary has determined t along with other may be disposed 4. Lear informs that othe Hon’ble Supreme which are pendin 5. At th may be disposed Supreme Court. 6. Taki while simultaneo arising from dela compensation @ the Land Acquisit 7. For stands allowed i SLPs. 02.04.2026 Jiten Whe Whe Uplo of 2024 Page No. 2 of 2 assessed by the Reference Court before this Court and a Co-ordinat o. 1528 of 2018 titled ‘Raj Kumar Haryana & Ors.’ vide judgment da ed the market value of the acquired ther statutory benefits. Learned co sed of in terms of the said order da Learned AAG Haryana does not d other land owners have filed SLP (C eme Court; whereas the State has f nding before Hon’ble Supreme Cour At this, learned counsel for the ap osed of subject to the outcome o rt. Taking into account the judicial d aneously preventing undue financia delayed filing, this Court holds that n @₹3,27,06,044/- per acre, along uisition Act, 1894. For the reasons recorded above, t ed in the above terms, subject to hether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No hether reportable : Yes/No Uploaded on: .04.2026 urt, had preferred separate Regula inate Bench, in a bunch of appeals mar (deceased) through LRs & Anr t dated 18.10.2022 (Annexure P- uired land @ ₹3,27,06,044/- per acre d counsel submits that this appea r dated 18.10.2022. ot dispute this factual position bu P (C) 020013-020042 of 2023 befor as filed SLP(c) 13825-13841 of 2023 Court. appellant submits that this appea e of SLPs pending before Hon’bl ial discipline of maintaining parit ncial burden on the acquiring bod hat the appellant shall be entitled to ong with all statutory benefits unde e, the present Regular First Appea t to the final outcome of aforesaid (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE gular eals, Anr. -1) acre peal but efore 023, peal n’ble arity body ed to nder peal esaid JITEN SHARMA 2026.04.02 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document