Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1787 (PNJ)

SEHZAD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/2562/2026 · 2026-03-06

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

         !"# .  $ %$& !''"() *+('" ! , ( - (./0"- 12!' "1!1 '!  /" Present: Mr. Sham Lal Saha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. 3' (2 % "(()" "  4 **** 1!1 '!  /" 513( 04 1. Instant criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred for issuance of a writ in the nature Habeas Corpus to release the detenues (as mentioned in para No.4 of the present petition), who is stated to be illegally detained by respondents Nos.4 to 6 in the brick kiln owned by them. 2. A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013, titled as          , has held as under:2 “                                                                           !"!#  $  % &'   ('!)#"* +       +        +    +       +          '     ,    -                 .         +      +   $  % &'   ( '!)#"  +          JITESH LAL 2026.03.06 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document      +                +            /      )!01!      2   3     4             ,  -            !)#"'                         +                      5 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.22District Magistrate, Sonepat, Haryana, to treat this petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along2with a copy of the writ petition.  31!1 '!  /" 4 12 "   1 '"! 66$,789$*9 66$$,$:; *9 JITESH LAL 2026.03.06 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document