FAO-3397 IN THE HIG 235 Charanjit Sin Nagina Devi CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. car laying ch Motor Accid 2013 dated awarded as recovery rig Company ag Singh/driver 2. the main ap 19.02.2020. appearance o when the pr notice to the 15.02.2025, appeal as we 97-2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o njit Singh Versus a Devi and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been fil ing challenge to the Award dated 19.0 Accident Claims Tribunal, Amritsar ted 19.08.2013, whereby an amou ed as compensation to claimant/respo ry rights have been granted to any against the appellant/owner and r /driver of the offending car. The matter pertains to the year ain appeal was issued by the Predece 2020. Perusal of the order-sheets s rance on behalf of the appellant after the present appeal was listed along w to the appellant as well as his counsel 2025, following order has been passe l as well as the other connected appeals ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3397-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA een filed by the owner of offending ed 19.03.2019 passed by the learned ritsar in MACT Case No. 23117 of amount of ₹14,02,878/- had been t/respondents No. 1 to 3 herein and to respondent No. 6-Insurance r and respondent No. 4-Jatinder Pal e year 2019 and notice of motion in redecessor Bench vide order dated eets shows that none had put in t after 19.02.2020. On 13.03.2023, long with other connected appeals, ounsel was ordered to be issued. On passed by this Court in the present ppeals:- ding rned 7 of een and ance Pal n in ated t in 023, , . On sent RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-3397 3. despite the c last date of h 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution. 5. 6. 29.04.2026 rishu 97-2019 (O&M) -2- “Perusal of the file rev hearing i.e. 13.03.2023, notices their counsel (in all cases) were Pursuant thereto, as per for the appellant(s) have been fixed; whereas notice(s) issue cases) have been received back has put in appearance on their In the interest of justice, a A photocopy of this ord other connected cases.” Today, none has put in appearan e the case having been called twice. S te of hearing as well. A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable reveals that on the last date of tices to the appellant(s) as well as were ordered to be issued. per office report, learned counsel een duly informed about the date ssued to the appellant(s) (in all back duly served. However, none heir behalf. ice, adjourned to 31.07.2025. order be placed on the files of pearance on behalf of the appellant, wice. Similar is the position on the ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of as sel te all ne of lant, the llant sent the the terly this RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.