RSA-2113- IN THE HI 218 Meeta Ram Darshan Ram CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j suit for ma directed and suit of reco fee/compens in the alterna 2. is of the ye Predecessor -2013 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H RSA Date o Ram Versus an Ram M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate fo Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant-appellant is in rrent judgments rendered by both the r mandatory injunction to the effect th d and ordered to stop use and occupa f recovery of ₹8400/- from the def mpensation @ ₹700/- per month from alternative for possession has been dec “23. As a result of the aforem the suit is decreed with co injunction. The defendant is d occupation of the shop in disp directed to pay an amount of R fee/compensation to the plainti accordingly and the file be con room, SBS Nagar.” Perusal of the order-sheet(s) rev the year 2013 and notice of motion essor Bench of this Court vide order ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2113-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the appellant. ate for the respondent. is in second appeal against the th the District Courts whereby the ffect that the appellant-defendant be ccupation of the disputed shop; and e defendant as arrears of licence from 05.04.2000 to 20.03.2011; or en decreed in entirety, as under:- orementioned issue-wise findings, costs for relief of mandatory is directed to stop the use and dispute. Further, the defendant is of Rs.8400/- as arrears of licence aintiff. Decree sheet be prepared e consigned to the judicial record t(s) reveal(s) that the present appeal otion was issued way back by the order dated 14.05.2013. Thereafter, the the be and ence ; or gs, ry nd is ce ed rd peal the fter, RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2113- on account second appe 25.04.2014 appeal was r was repeated appellant. 3. present seco plaintiff has the sole appe 4. 5. for the appel rendered inf 6. 09.02.2026 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- count of non-appearance on behalf appeal was dismissed for non- 2014. Subsequently, vide order da l was restored to its original number. T peatedly adjourned mostly at the requ Today, learned counsel for th t second appeal has been rendered in ff has taken possession of the suit sho le appellant in the present case has also Heard. In view of the above noted su appellant, the present second appeal infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ehalf of the appellant, the present -prosecution vide order dated er dated 12.08.2014, the present mber. Thereafter, the present appeal e request of learned counsel for the for the appellant submits that the red infructuous as, the respondent- uit shop. It is further submitted that as also expired. ted submissions of learned counsel ppeal is disposed of as having been any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No sent ated sent peal r the the that nsel een RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.