Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1762 (PNJ)

KANCHAN RANI AND ANOTHER v. ANINDITA MITRA, IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/6055/2025 · 2026-03-05

Nidhi Gupta

Special Leave Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 135 Kanchan R Smt. Anin Punjab Civ CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU of interim predecessor 28683-2013 and others” COCP-6055-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.6055 o Date of decision : han Rani and another Versus Anindita Mitra, IAS, Secretary, D ab Civil Secretariat, Sec.1, Chandigar AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Amit Sharma (Kanav), Adv for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has b nterim order dated 21.7.2025 (Ann cessor Bench of this Court in CM 2013 titled as “Harvinder Singh and thers”, whereby it was ordered as under “CWP-9934-CWP-2025 Having heard lea the present application dated 22.05.2025 passe read thus: "1. Learned coun SLP (C) No.2350 Appeal No. 00231 on 01.08.2024, in counsel submits take necessary ac 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6055 of 2025 (O & M) ision :-05.03.2026 …..Petitioners ary, Department of Education ndigarh and another …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ), Advocate , AAG Punjab. n has been filed alleging violation (Annexure P-1) passed by a CM-9934-CWP-2025 in CWP- gh and others vs. State of Punjab s under :- 2025 learned counsel for the parties, ion is disposed of and the order assed in CWP-28683-2013 be counsel for the parties state that 3507-2010 converted into Civil 02317-2011 now stands decided 4, in view of which learned State its that the respondents would y action in terms thereof within VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document necessary c dated 26.2.2 produced b record. Cop Registry to Writ Court with while authority, same may b granted to 26.2.2026 a by learned disposed o the said Spe March 05, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-6055-2025 (O & M) a period of 6 m learned counsel fo 2. Disposed of acc Learned counsel for the res ssary compliance has been made while 26.2.2026; thus, no cause survives in th Copy of the aforesaid Speak ced by the learned counsel for the re d. Copy thereof is supplied to learned stry to tag/paginate the same at appropri Learned counsel for the petitio Court order dated 21.7.2025 (Annexu while passing a Speaking Order dated 2 rity, nothing survives in the present may be disposed of. Learned counsel ed to the petitioners to challenge the 2026 as per law. In view of the above noted fact arned counsel for the petitioner, the p sed of. However, liberty is granted to said Speaking Order as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 6 months, which satisfies the sel for the petitioners. f accordingly." e respondent-State submits that while passing a Speaking Order es in the present petition. Speaking order dated 26.2.2026 the respondent-State is taken on earned counsel for the petitioners. propriate place in the paper-book. petitioners submits that since the nnexure P-1) has been complied ated 26.2.2026 by the respondent- resent contempt petition and the unsel submits that liberty may be e the said Speaking Order dated ed facts and the submissions made , the present contempt petition is ted to the petitioners to challenge any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document