FAO-5742 IN THE HIG 235-C Nagina Devi Jatinder Pal CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. enhancemen vide Award Claims Trib 19.08.2013 2. the main app un-represent present appe 3. adjourned f 42-2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o a Devi and others Versus er Pal Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been fi cement of compensation amount of ward dated 19.03.2019 passed by s Tribunal, Amritsar in MACT Cas 2013. The matter pertains to the year in appeal is yet to be issued. On 15.02 resented and following order has bee t appeal as well as in the other connec “Perusal of the file rev hearing i.e. 13.03.2023, notices their counsel (in all cases) were Pursuant thereto, as per for the appellant(s) have been fixed; whereas notice(s) issue cases) have been received back has put in appearance on their In the interest of justice, a A photocopy of this ord other connected cases.” On the last date of hearing i.e ned for today; on account of no ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5742-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA een filed by the claimants seeking of ₹14,02,878/- awarded to them d by the learned Motor Accident T Case No. 23117 of 2013 dated e year 2019 and notice of motion in 15.02.2025 the appellants had gone as been passed by this Court in the onnected appeals:- reveals that on the last date of tices to the appellant(s) as well as were ordered to be issued. per office report, learned counsel een duly informed about the date ssued to the appellant(s) (in all back duly served. However, none heir behalf. ice, adjourned to 31.07.2025. order be placed on the files of ing i.e. 31.07.2025, the matter was of non-appearance on behalf of king dent ated in one the of as sel te all ne of was of RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-5742 appellant(s) Today again despite the c 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Moreover, 3397-2019 recovery rig Award impu Court. Thus, instant appea 5. 6. 29.04.2026 rishu 42-2019 (O&M) -2- ant(s) in connected appeals bearing FA again, none has put in appearance e the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above fa exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in , vide order of even date the con 2019 filed by the owner of the of ry rights granted to respondent No. impugned herein has been dismissed Thus, this Court is left with no other t appeal for non-prosecution, as well. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ing FAO Nos. 3397 and 3400-2019. arance on behalf of the appellants ove facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. connected appeal bearing FAO- the offending car challenging the nt No. 3-Insurance Company vide missed for non-prosecution by this other option except to dismiss the . any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 019. sent in d an tter. the vide this the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.