Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1398 (AP)

DOMMETI SRINIVASA RAO v. DOMMETI CHITTI KUMARI

CMA/1229/2012 · 2026-08-18

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, D Ramesh

Original Suitbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010689122013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 76 OF Between: 1. S.MANIMALKA, W/o.S.Satish Kumar R/o.17 Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 1. S SATISH KUMAR, S/o.K.Subramanyam R/o.2 Opp. to Kola Street,Tirupati, Chittoor District. Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 172 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the hearing of the appeal Counsel for the Petitioner: J UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent T JANARDHAN RAO The Court made the following order: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 76 OF 2013 1. S.MANIMALKA, W/o.S.Satish Kumar R/o.17-1-38, Aravapalli Street, ...Petitioner AND 1. S SATISH KUMAR, S/o.K.Subramanyam R/o.2-2-236/11, Chinnagunta, Opp. to Kola Street,Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...Responden Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 172 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased he appeal Counsel for the Petitioner: J UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent T JANARDHAN RAO The Court made the following order: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA 38, Aravapalli Street, ...Petitioner 236/11, Chinnagunta, ...Respondent Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 76 OF 2013 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) Learned counsel appearing for both the parties submits that nothing survives for consideration in the present appeal. 2. In view of the said submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed. ____________ D.RAMESH, J ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Dated:19.08.2026 TJN 62 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 76 OF 2013 Dated: 19.08.2026 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 76 OF 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 19.8.2026 DR, J & AHHS, J The appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Judgment) _______ DR, J _______ AHHS, J TJN