Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1382 (AP)

SRI SITHARAMA SWAMY TEMPLE, EG.DIST. v. JT. COLLECTOR, E.G. DIST. & 24 OT

WP/7785/2013 · 2026-06-21

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Transfer Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:________________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of Pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010756082013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7785/2013 Between: 1. SRI SITHARAMA SWAMY TEMPLE, EG.DIST., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, SRI YERRA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O VENKAT RAO, AGED 48 YEARS, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JT COLLECTOR E G DIST 24 OT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 2. THE ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, BOOMANNA GALLI, BARKATPURA, HYDERABAD, A.P. 3. KANDIPALLI NAGARAJU, S/O PEDA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 4. KANDIPALLI NAGARAJU, S/O LATE NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O VENKATARAYAPURAM NAGAMPETA, KOMARAGIRI POST., U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 5. KANDIPALLI POTURAJU, S/O NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2 6. KANDIPALLY SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 7. KANDIPALLI NOOKARAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 8. KANDIPALLI KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O LATE CHINA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 9. KANDIPALLI CHANDRA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 10. KANDIPALLI SRI LAKSHMI, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, LANDLADY, R/O NAGAMPETA, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 11. VASAMSETTI NEREYYA, S/O LATE NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 12. VASAMSETTI APPARAO ABBULU, S/O LATE NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 13. VASAMSETTI BAPANAYYA, S/O LATE NOOKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 14. VASAMSETTI NOOKAYYA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 15. PENKEY NARAYAMURTHY, S/O VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VENKATARAYAPURAM, KOMARAGIRI POST., U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 16. GULLAPALLI KRISHNA, S/O NOOKALU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O SAGARANAGARAM, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL 17. ANISETTI VYASAMURTHY, S/O SOORANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KOMARAGIRI, NEAR REDDY RAMALAYAM OF U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 18. RAYUDU ATCHAMANI, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, LANDLADY, R/O NAGAMPETA, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 19. GULLAPALLI SRINIVAS, S/O NOOKALU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O SAGARANAGARAM, KOMARAGIRI POST, 3 U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 20. GOLLAPALLI SATYANARAYANA, S/O NOOKALU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RIO SAGARANAGARAM, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 21. GOLLAPALLI VEERABHASKARARAO, S/O NOOKALU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O SAGARANAGARAM, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHA.PALLI MANDAL. 22. BUTTA SURYANARAYANA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS C/O D/O PAKKURTHI KONDAMMA, KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 23. THANGELLA VEERASAMMA, W/O RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RIO KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 24. PALLA APPALASWAMY, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RIO KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. 25. THANGELLA JAGADAMBA, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KOMARAGIRI POST, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL. (RESPONDENTS 3, 5 TO 7, & 11 TO 14 ARE DOING CULTIVATION AND ARE RESIDENTS OF NAGAMPETA, KOMARAGIRI POST OF U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in recording his findings while finally observing that the order passed is not on merits and that the petitioner temple shall prosecute the remedies in the competent civil Court as illegal, arbitrary etc., and consequently direct to issue findings of the 1st respondent in the impugned order made in Ref D9/137/2008, dated 19.05.2012 without prejudice to the rights and contentions of either parties in the impugned order and grant such other just and consequential relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 9752 OF 2013 4 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of the above writ petition, pending disposal of the above writ petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. The Court made the following: 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7785/2013 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the proceeding sheet that there was no representation for the petitioner on 15.06.2026. The matter is posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 6 64 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7785/2013 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP