APHC010450932013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28109/2013 Between: 1. BODA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O SRI VENKATESWAR RAO, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, PRIYA GENERAL & FANCY STORES, D.NO.2-40-165/4, ALCOT GARDEN, OPP. RAILWAY STATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD-500022. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, RAJAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. NAMBARI PARVATHI, W/O VENKAT RAO, HINDU, AGED 72 YEARS, D.NO.2-40-165/4, ALCOT GARDEN, OPP. RAILWAY STATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice dt.28.08.2013, ROC No.5547/2013-G1,Circle-V11- 24, issued by the 2nd respondent under Sec. 456 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, directing the petitioner to vacate the building premises immediately and to pull down the building bearing Door No.2- 40-165, Opp. Railway Station, Rajahmundry, within 7 days from the date of the receipt of the notice, without giving any opportunity to the petitioner to place his grievance, as invalid, illegal, arbitrary, void and contrary to the HMC Act 1955, and Rules made there under, which is against to the Principles of Natural Justice, by consequently directing the respondent no.2 not to implement the said notice either by evicting the petitioner or from demolishing or pulling down the structures existing in the building premises D.No.2-40-165, Opp. Railway Station, Rajahmundry, IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 34892 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass Interim Orders by directing the respondent no.2 not to implement the Impugned Notice dt.28.08.2013, ROC No.5547/ 2013-G1,Circle-VII-24, either by evicting the petitioner or from demolishing or pulling down the structures existing in the building premises D.No.2- 40-165, Opp. Railway Station, Rajahmundry, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.28109 of 2013 ORDER:- 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent authorities submit that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives. It is submitted that the petitioner is no longer in occupation of the subject premises, as the property has since changed hands. It is further submitted that the present owner/landlord has demolished the existing structure and constructed a new building after obtaining the necessary permissions from the competent authorities. 2. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 302 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.28109 of 2013 Dated 19.06.2026 KGM