APHC010155232013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26291/2013 Between: 1. B.KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O B.SIVASANKARA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.87-560-1, SRINAGAR COLONY, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, URDU GALLI, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE INAMS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one 2 MRK,J W.P.No.26291 of 2013 in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land land in Sy.No. 437/6 admeasuring Ac. 058 cents situated at Tiruchanuru village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, without following the due process of Law, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the above said land, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon‟ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32509 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of land in Sy.No. 437/6, admeasuring Ac. 0-58 cents situated at Tiruchanuru village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 46029 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead as Respondents No 6 to 10 IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 145647 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD) 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU 3 MRK,J W.P.No.26291 of 2013 4. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED) 5. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 6. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following: 4 MRK,J W.P.No.26291 of 2013 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26291 of 2013 ORDER:- The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land land in Sy.No. 437/6 admeasuring Ac. 058 cents situated at Tiruchanuru village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, without following the due process of Law, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the above said land, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case….” 2. On 30.04.2026 this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. Post on 05.05.2026 under the caption for dismissal. Registry is directed to print the name of Sri K. Mallikarjuna Moorthy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation, in the Causelist.” 3. The writ petition is instituted in the year 2013. Though the writ petition is listed under the caption of „for dismissal‟, unfortunately, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 5 MRK,J W.P.No.26291 of 2013 4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 05.05.2026 PBS 6 MRK,J W.P.No.26291 of 2013 243 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.26291 of 2013 Date: 05.05.2026 PBS