Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1365 (AP)

Koduri Jagadeeswari W/o A. Rajendra Prasad Babu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/35120/2013 · 2026-05-04

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010343592013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35120/2013 Between: 1. KODURI JAGADEESWARI W/O A. RAJENDRA PRASAD BABU,, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI WORKER, RIO SUBBAMPETA, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ALLURI SYAMALA RATNAM W/O BOBBA SATYANARAYANA,, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI WORKER, RIO CHAKRADHAVARAPALLI VILLAGE, GURVAIGUDEM POST, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. P.N.B. LAKSHMIKANTHAM W/O NARALA VENKATASUBBARAO,, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI WORKER, RIO BAYYANAGUDEM POST, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU, - 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ICDS PROJECT, ZONE - 2, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI 2 DISTRICT. 5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR I C D S PROJECT ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. PROJECT OFFICER I C D S PROJECT CHINTALAPUDI WEST GODAVA, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in selecting the contract supervisors, who obtained less marks in the merit list in spite of recruiting the petitioners, who secured merit marks and being regular in their service for over 25 years for the post of Grade-II Supervisor on permanent basis, in the examination conducted on 04.08.2013, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners to the post of Supervisor Grade-II in the services of respondents and pass other orders or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 43653 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners to the post of Supervisor Grade-II in the services of respondents, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BONTHU RAJANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. On 21.04.2026 also, as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, this Writ Petition is “dismissed for non-prosecution”. No order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.05.05.2026 SR