Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1342 (AP)

K. Rajendra Prasad S/o Subba Rao, v. The Andhra Bank rep by its

WP/30346/2013 · 2026-04-06

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010750452013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30346/2013 Between: 1. K. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O SUBBA RAO, OCC:EX-EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO. 24-2-26, BANDIVARI STREET, SAJJAPURAM, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA BANK REP BY ITS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PATTABHI BHAVAN, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA BANK, PATTABHI BHAVAN, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, JANGAON BRANCH, WARANGAL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to direct the Respondents herein to release the hypothecated property in connection with the Building Advance Loans vide Account Nos. 000630013000960 and 086630100044986 upon payment of outstanding debt by the petitioner by releasing the documents and grant such other relief and reliefs as this Hon' ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37666 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to forthwith release the documents of the mortgaged property in connection with account Nos. 000630013000960 and 086630100044986, upon petitioner paying the outstanding debt to the said accounts, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further adjudication on merits. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 07.04.2026 SR