Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1341 (AP)

G.JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST v. DIR OF SUGAR AND CANE COMMR, HYD & ANOTHER

WP/26994/2013 · 2026-04-06

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010601912013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26994/2013 Between: 1. G.JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC.: SUGAR GODOWN KEEPER, THE CHITTOOR COOPERATIVE SUGARS LIMITED, CHITTOOR, R/O.H.NO.21-362, D. VENGANAPALLI VILLAGE, T. CHAVATAPALLI MANDAL POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT -517 004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DIR OF SUGAR AND CANE COMMR HYD ANOTHER, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., EXHIBITION GROUNDS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHITTOOR COOPERATIVE SUGARS LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing notice in R.C.No.CCS:ESTT:OM:2013, dated 12-08-2013 retiring the petitioner from service with effect from 30-09-2013 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further declare that petitioner is entitled to continue in service till he attains 60 years of age and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3211 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted earlier by this Honble Court dated: 17.09.2013 in WPMP No. 33412 of 2013 in WP No.26994 of 2013 in the interest of Justice IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 33412 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted earlier by this Honble Court dated: 17.09.2013 in WPMP No. 33412 of 2013 in WP No.26994 of 2013 in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3643 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner herein as 3rd Respondent in W.P.No.26994/2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WVMP 16105 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A G SATYANARAYANA RAO 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) 3. T BALAJI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further adjudication on merits. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 07.04.2026 SR