Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1330 (AP)

D. Jaya Varma v. Girijan Cooperative Corporation Ltd,

WP/24841/2013 · 2026-04-15

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.24841_2013 APHC010335812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24841/2013 Between: 1. D. JAYA VARMA, S/O D.RAVI VARMA AGED 38 YEARS R/O 3-221, 6TH STREET, OLD DAIRY FARM, ADARSHNAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GIRIJAN COOPERATIVE CORPORATION LTD, Chinna Waltair, Visakhapatnam, Represented by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the Resolution No. 26/2012-13 passed by the Board of the Respondent in its meeting held on 21.12.2012, resolving not to give promotion to the petitioner with retrospective effect and communicating the same vide Rc.No. 399/2012/Board dt 07.01.2013 and also the consequential orders passed by the Vice Chairman and Managing Director of the Respondent herein in RC No. 1060/2010 Admn.1 dt 24.04.2013 as wholly illegal and arbitrary, and to consequently direct the Respondent herein to promote the petitioner to the post of Senior Salesman from the date of his acquiring qualification of graduation i.e. 01.06.2004 and further promote him to the post of Senior Assistant from the date his juniors are promoted i.e. 2 HN, J W.P.No.24841_2013 6.4.2013, with all consequential and monetary benefits; Award costs and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 30623 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the Resolution No. 26/2012-13 passed by the Board of the Respondent in its meeting held on 21.12.2012, resolving not to give promotion to the petitioner with retrospective effect and communicating the same vide Rc.No. 399/2012/Board dt. 07.01.2013 and also the consequential orders passed by the Vice Chairman and Managing Director of the Respondent herein in RC No. 1060/2010 Admn.1 dt. 24.04.2013 as wholly illegal and arbitrary, and to consequently direct the Respondent herein to promote the petitioner to the post of Senior Salesman from the date of his acquiring qualification of graduation i.e. 01.06.2004 and further promote him to the post of Senior Assistant from the date his juniors are promoted i.e. 06.04.2013, with all consequential and monetary benefits; Award costs and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SANTHOSH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P.V.V SATYANARAYANA (SC FOR GIRIJAN C O) 3 HN, J W.P.No.24841_2013 ORDER: 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record the instructions received. As per the instructions, the petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant with effect from 21.12.2012, vide proceedings dated 31.07.2015. 3. Recording the same, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.04.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.24841_2013 169 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24841 of 2013 Date: 16.04.2026 NKA