APHC010761132013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35762/2013 Between: 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER,, APSRTC, BAPATLA DEPOT.GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,, APSRTC, GUNTUR. 1. AKKALA YEDUKONDALA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, EX. RTC DRIVER, E.725614 2. THE HONBLE LABOUR COURT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari (a) call for the records relating to and related to Award passed by the Labour Court, Guntur in 1.D. No. 118/2006 Dated. 25.03.2013 published on 23.05.2013 in G.O. 04.05.2013 and quash or set aside the same by declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the law and (b) consequently declare that the respondent is not entitled for any relief since the respondent was disqualified from the post of driver due to his under height and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35762/2013 THE DEPOT MANAGER,, APSRTC, BAPATLA DEPOT.GUNTUR THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,, APSRTC, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND AKKALA YEDUKONDALA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, EX. RTC THE HONBLE LABOUR COURT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be opriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari (a) call for the records relating to and related to Award passed by the Labour Court, Guntur in 1.D. No. 118/2006 Dated. 25.03.2013 published on 23.05.2013 in G.O. Rt. No.393 Dated 04.05.2013 and quash or set aside the same by declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the law and (b) consequently declare that the is not entitled for any relief since the respondent was disqualified ost of driver due to his under height and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] THE DEPOT MANAGER,, APSRTC, BAPATLA DEPOT.GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) AKKALA YEDUKONDALA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, EX. RTC THE HONBLE LABOUR COURT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be opriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari (a) call for the records relating to and related to Award passed by the Labour Court, Guntur in 1.D. No. 118/2006 Rt. No.393 Dated 04.05.2013 and quash or set aside the same by declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the law and (b) consequently declare that the is not entitled for any relief since the respondent was disqualified 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 44459 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the award passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court, Guntur in ID.No.118/2006, dated: 25.03.2013, published on 23.05.2013 in GO.Rt.No.393, dated: 04.05.2013 and pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 165052 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the petitioner herein on record as 3rd respondent in WP.no.35762 of 2013 as well as IA.No.1 of 2013, as legal representative of the 1st respondent andpass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY(SC FOR APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Heard Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for A.P.S.R.T.C. 2. On account of the efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as the 1st respondent has also attained the age of superannuation during the pendency of the writ petition and there was no interim order granted suspending or modifying the award under challenge when the writ petition was filed. As such, no further orders are required in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. It is made clear to the petitioners to release the service benefits due and payable to the deceased employee, if not already paid, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 07.04.2026 PNS