Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1312 (AP)

A. Rajendra Prasad, v. The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Director of Sugar

WP/35627/2013 · 2026-04-05

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010427192013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35627/2013 Between: 1. A. RAJENDRA PRASAD,, S/O VARADAIAH AGED 58 YEARS, DH CLERK (S) 2. N. SUBBULU,, S/O CHINNABBA AGED 58 YEARS, CF MATE (S) BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE EMPLOYED IN SV COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY LIMITED, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS DIRECTOR OF SUGAR, & CANE COMMISSIONER A.P., EXHIBITION GROUNDS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI VENKATESWARA COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY LIMITED, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further adjudication on merits. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 06.04.2026 SR