Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2013 DAILYLAW 1301 (AP)

Milapalli Lakshmaiah, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26516/2013 · 2026-04-07

Harinath N

body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010120622013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26516/2013 Between: 1. MILAPALLI LAKSHMAIAH,, S/O.M.SUBBARAIDU, OCC:CONTRACT WORKER, SRI KHALAHASTEESWARA SWAMI DEVASTHANAMS, R/O.3-348, KARNALA STREET, SRI KALAHASTHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD 3. SRI KALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHANAMS, SRIKALAHASTHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SPECIAL GRADE DEPUTY COLLECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondent No.3 in extending the benefit of uniform remuneration as has been directed by the respondent No.2 through Circular/A1/4824/2013 dated 5.2.2013 as arbitrary,illegal,discriminative colorable exercise of power and violative of the 2 fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles, 14,19,and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to extend the benefit of uniform remuneration to the petitioner also as has been directed by the respondent No.2 through Circular/A1/4824/2013 dated 5.2.2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32802 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to extend the benefit of uniform remuneration to the petitioner also as has been directed by the respondent No.2 through his circular /A1/4824/2013 dated 5.2.2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave for filing of this Counter Affidavit dated 29 -12-2024 in W.P.No. 26516 of 2013 in the interest of justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Petitioner is seeking a direction for extension of the benefits in pursuance of the circular dated 05.02.2013. This Court vide interim orders dated 12.09.2013 directed the Executive Officer of the 3rd respondent temple to consider paying wages to the petitioner in light of the circular dated 05.02.2013 issued by the Commissioner of Endowments. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 3rd Respondent, submits that the 3rd respondent has extended all the benefits for which the petitioner is entitled in light of the circular and that the petitioner along with other employees are already extended to the benefit of minimum time scale without allowances. This is under the instructions of the government with effect from issuance of the orders. It is also stated in the counter that the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to file afresh if aggrieved by any further orders of the respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.08.04.2026 SR